<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Barcamp on Open Source Currency</title>
    <link>https://blog.opensourcecurrency.org/tags/barcamp/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Barcamp on Open Source Currency</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 03:18:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.opensourcecurrency.org/tags/barcamp/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>BarCamp Houston Slides</title>
      <link>https://blog.opensourcecurrency.org/2007/08/27/barcamp-houston-slides/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 03:18:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.opensourcecurrency.org/2007/08/27/barcamp-houston-slides/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Great Q/A and discussion at &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.barcamp.org/BarCampHouston&#34;&gt;BarCamp Houston&lt;/a&gt; as the presentation was in the smaller of the two rooms. After the session, I had a conversation with someone who had a degree in economics and he asked if any economists had written anything about complementary currency. I mentioned to him that the London School of Economics had published a paper of Edgar Cahn&amp;rsquo;s. I&amp;rsquo;m reminded of Lietaer saying that the so-called Nobel Prize in Economics* will never be awarded to an intentional economist.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
