<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Patents on Open Source Currency</title>
    <link>https://blog.opensourcecurrency.org/tags/patents/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Patents on Open Source Currency</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 13:40:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.opensourcecurrency.org/tags/patents/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Software and patents</title>
      <link>https://blog.opensourcecurrency.org/2007/05/11/software-and-patents/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 13:40:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.opensourcecurrency.org/2007/05/11/software-and-patents/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A lot of people who understand and enjoy Open Source Software don&amp;rsquo;t necessarily realize one of the main problems with the way the Software industry entrenches itself in a way to remove the ability to innovate form the general public and society as whole..&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Software is a mutant in the sense that it can be both copyrighted and patented. The article &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/blogs/software_aint_patentable_damnit_part_2&#34;&gt;Software ain&amp;rsquo;t patentable, damn it! (2)&lt;/a&gt; points out the difference fairly well while discussing a &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/blogs/software_aint_patentable_damn_it&#34;&gt;legal case&lt;/a&gt; putting junk patents at risk.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
